(1) Billingham,J - Kingston,Ian [C28]
West Nottingham 1 - University 1 (5), 14.11.2005

Some of the variations in the analysis of this game are very long. They're definitely worth playing through, though, especially the extraordinary note to White's 26th move. Most of the analysis is the computer's work; I've just selected the most interesting and important variations.

1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bc4 Bc5
[3...Nc6 is the main alternative here.]

4.d3 Nc6 5.Nge2
I can only find two previous games with this move: Mieses-Von Scheve, Leipzig 1888 (1-0) and Marsalek-Blatny, Chocen 1950 (0-1). If White wishes to stay with the Vienna (rather than transposing to the Giuoco Pianissimo with 5.Nf3), 5.f4 is the natural move.

5...d6 6.Na4
[Marsalek chose the horrible 6.Bg5? against Blatny, who finished him off in some style: 6...Bxf2+ 7.Kf1 Bb6 8.Ng3 h6 9.Bd2 Ng4 10.Qf3 0-0 11.Nf5 h5 12.h3 Bxf5 13.exf5 Nd4 14.Qd1 Qh4 15.Ne4 Nxf5 16.hxg4 Qxh1+ 17.Ke2 Qxg2+ 18.Ke1 Qg1+ 19.Ke2 Nd4# ]

6...Bb6 7.Nxb6 axb6 8.Bg5
[Having removed the bishop White's natural choice is 8.f4 , although Black should have few problems.]

8...h6 9.Bh4 Be6 10.Nc3 g5
Both sides having been waiting to see where the other intends to castle. This move signals that Black will go the queenside, but more or less forces White to do the same, since the advanced black pawns would mean a ready-made attack if White should castle kingside.

11.Bg3 Qd7 12.Bxe6 Qxe6 13.Qd2 0-0-0 14.0-0-0 d5
Despite my slightly shaggy pawn structure, I've come out of the opening pretty well. This pawn break gives me the initiative in the centre.

15.exd5 Nxd5 16.a3
This stops any tricks aimed at a2, but weakens b3.

16...Nd4
I was very happy at this point. I have a nice position in the centre and more space, and the kingside pawns are ready to roll.

17.Rde1
My first instinct was that this is a mistake: the other rook gets locked out of the game. But there is one significant benefit, as we shall see.

17...f6 18.f3 Qc6
The original idea here was to threaten to break up White's queenside pawns. The secondary point is the Nb3+ tactic if the knight moves away. Of course, 19.Nxd5 threatens a fork of its own, which means that 19...Nb3+ loses a piece. But the longer I looked at this line, the more I began to suspect that I could get a strong attack by sacrificing the piece. Without analysing very much, I decided to go for it.

19.Nxd5 Nb3+
[Now 19...Rxd5 20.Kb1 Rc5 gives me a very comfortable position, so the knight sacrifice is hardly necessary. So why play Nb3+? It turns out that the defence is very difficult, whereas my moves are easy to find. White's problems stem from the fact that the bishop and the king's rook are effectively out of play, while his king remains vulnerable in the centre.]

20.Kd1 Rxd5
[Only possible because of 17.Rde1, so perhaps that wasn't so bad after all. Originally I had intended to play 20...Qxd5 21.cxb3 Qxb3+ but after 22.Ke2 my rooks are slow getting into the action and the attack can easily fizzle out. So I had to think again, wondering whether or not I'd overdone the optimism. Fortunately, there is a decent alternative.]

21.cxb3 Rhd8 22.Ke2 Qb5 23.Rd1 f5
[Up to here both players' moves have been more or less forced. Now computer analysis suggests that 23...Qxb3 24.Qb4 Rxd3 25.Qxb3 Rxb3 26.Rxd8+ Kxd8 27.Rd1+ Ke7 28.Rd2 is best, when Black doesn't have enough compensation. Having spent a long time analysing the position after 23.Rd1 I agree with the computer, but entering this line would be almost equivalent to resigning. Therefore it makes sense to avoid chasing material, and to try to maintain pressure against the white king.]

24.Qc3?
[This looks natural (it prevents ...e4), but it gives up most of White's advantage. White's other main choices, 24.Qc2 and 24.Qb4!, should win. Providing a detailed analysis here is next to impossible; some sample variations follow. 24.Qc2 This is good and probably sufficient to win. However, Black has plenty of chances. 24...Rc5 25.Qb1 e4 26.fxe4 fxe4 27.Rhe1 h5 28.b4 (28.a4 is also good for White) 28...exd3+ (28...Rcd5 29.Qc1 (The attempt to simplify to an endgame with two extra pawns by 29.Kf2? leads only to draw at best. The following almost forced variation shows why: 29...h4 30.Bxc7 Kxc7 31.dxe4 Rxd1 32.Rxd1 Rf8+ 33.Kg1 Qe2 34.Re1 Qf2+ 35.Kh1 h3 36.Rg1 Qe2 37.Qc1+ Kb8 38.Qxg5 hxg2+ 39.Qxg2 Rf2 40.Qg3+ Ka7 41.h3 Qxe4+ 42.Rg2 Qb1+ 43.Kh2 Rf1 44.Rg1 Qc2+ 45.Rg2 (45.Kh1? Qe4+ 46.Qg2 Rf3 47.Kh2 Qf4+ 48.Kh1 Qf5 and Black wins) 45...Qb1 with a draw by repetition.) 29...c6 30.Kf1 and White should be able to hold on to the extra material.) 29.Rxd3 Rcd5 30.Rc1! Qxd3+ (30...c6 31.Rcc3 ) 31.Qxd3 Rxd3 32.Rxc7+ Kb8 33.Rc3+ Rxg3 34.Rxg3 with a probable win for White in the endgame; 24.Qb4! This is the move that refutes Black's sacrifice. I think it's hard to see because it appears to abandon the d-pawn, but White gets counterplay along the a-file and threatens to exchange queens. 24...Qc6 25.Rhe1 Qg6 (25...Rd4 26.Qc3 ) 26.Kf1 f4 27.Bf2 Rxd3 28.Rc1 and White's king is safe.]

24...Rc5 25.Qd2
[25.a4 Qa6 26.Qd2 may be good enough to win, but it's very tricky. Now I thought about repeating the position with 25...Rd5, but I felt that I could try for more.]

25...e4
White's excursion with the queen has cost time, and now my attack is very dangerous.

26.Rc1??
[26.fxe4! leads to some fantastic variations: 26...fxe4 27.Qb4 exd3+ 28.Kf2 Rf5+ (28...Rc2+ 29.Kg1 Qxb4 30.axb4 Rxb2 31.h4 Rxb3 (31...g4 32.h5 Rxb3 33.Bf4 Rxb4 34.Bxh6 is wild. Either side might win.) 32.hxg5 hxg5 33.Rh7 Rd7 is a probable draw) 29.Kg1 Qxb4 30.axb4 d2 31.h4 g4 32.Kh2 (32.Bf2 leads to something similar, but White might just be able to sneak a win. In some variations White can untangle his kingside pieces only to find that all of his b-pawns have vanished and the black queenside is ready to roll forward.) 32...b5! Otherwise White can play b5 and extract a rook from its misery via a4. 33.Ra1 Kb8 34.Rhd1 Rd3 and astoundingly Black has a positional draw: neither side can improve the position of their pieces or force a further weakness. After the move played, White is lost.]

26...Rxd3 27.Qb4?
[Allowing me to produce a neat mating finish. Instead, 27.fxe4 forces Black to find the following elegant win: 27...Rxd2+ 28.Kxd2 Qd7+ 29.Ke2 Qd4 30.Rxc5 Qxe4+ 31.Kf2 Qd4+ 32.Kf1 Qd3+ 33.Kf2 bxc5 34.Re1 (White cannot save the bishop: 34.Be5 Qd2+ 35.Kf1 (35.Kf3 g4+ 36.Kg3 Qe3+ 37.Kh4 Qxe5 with mate to follow) 35...Qd1+ 36.Kf2 Qxh1 ) 34...f4 ]

27...Rd2+!
[27...Rd2+ 28.Kxd2 Qd3+ 29.Ke1 Rxc1+ 30.Kf2 e3# ] 0-1